<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>astropolitics.org Blog &#187; Sci Fi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://astropolitics.org/blog1/index.php/category/sci-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://astropolitics.org/blog1</link>
	<description>Dr Dolman's place in cyberspace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Top Ten Space Weapons</title>
		<link>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2010/05/14/top-ten-space-weapons/</link>
		<comments>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2010/05/14/top-ten-space-weapons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dolman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Warfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astropolitics.org/blog1/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Christian Science Monitor offered a link to&#8221;the Worst Space Weapons Concepts Ever.&#8221;
The link connets to Space.com&#8217;s &#8220;Top Ten&#8221; pages, which has the &#8220;Top Ten Space Weapons.&#8221;
Sounds liek a bit of false advertising on CSM&#8217;s part, but the Space.com writer&#8217;s do try to titillate:
Weapons in space may seem like science fiction, but they&#8217;ve been creeping [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Christian Science Monitor</em> offered a link to&#8221;the <a title="Worst Space Weapons Ever" href="Worst Space Weapon Concepts Ever" target="_self">Worst Space Weapons Concepts Ever</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The link connets to <a title="Top Ten Space Weapons" href="http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/top10_space_weapons.html" target="_blank">Space.com</a>&#8217;s &#8220;Top Ten&#8221; pages, which has the &#8220;Top Ten Space Weapons.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds liek a bit of false advertising on <em>CSM</em>&#8217;s part, but the Space.com writer&#8217;s do try to titillate:</p>
<blockquote><p>Weapons in space may seem like science fiction, but they&#8217;ve been creeping ever closer toward science fact. The U.S. may have proposed a space weapon ban, but others are actively researching military strength in the high frontier. Here&#8217;s a look at 10 nasty ways warfare may reach space.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2010/05/14/top-ten-space-weapons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nanobrains for nanowarriors?</title>
		<link>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2008/03/11/nanobrains-for-nanowarriors/</link>
		<comments>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2008/03/11/nanobrains-for-nanowarriors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Esotericon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blah Blah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2008/03/11/nanobrains-for-nanowarriors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having been accused of being a nanobrain myself, I initially took offense&#8230; Seriously, this article suggests some very interesting developments—one could use this concept to control a MEMS device that could interact with molecules chemically, but could be controlled both in terms of movement and chemical interactivity, sort of like Fantastic Voyage without Raquel Welch… [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2">Having been accused of being a nanobrain myself, I initially took offense&#8230; Seriously, <a title="nanobrain" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7288426.stm" target="_blank">this article</a> suggests some very interesting developments<font face="Courier New" size="2">—</font><font size="2">one could use this concept to control a MEMS device that could interact with molecules chemically, but could be controlled both in terms of movement and chemical interactivity, sort of like <a title="fantastic voyage" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060397/" target="_blank">Fantastic Voyage</a> without Raquel Welch… </font></font><font size="2"><font size="2"><img id="image80" height="96" alt="vf.jpg" src="http://astropolitics.org/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/vf.thumbnail.jpg" /><img id="image79" height="96" alt="34.jpg" src="http://astropolitics.org/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/34.thumbnail.jpg" width="77" /></font></p>
<p></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2008/03/11/nanobrains-for-nanowarriors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Panama Canal Going Up?</title>
		<link>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2007/02/12/a-panama-canal-going-up/</link>
		<comments>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2007/02/12/a-panama-canal-going-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eros Pace</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sci Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2007/02/12/a-panama-canal-going-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s an emerging sci-fi technology that’s beginning to shed some of its giggle factor — enough so that a year ago last fall, Arthur C. Clarke felt comfortable saying the following in a London Times column: 
The space elevator was the central theme in my 1978 science-fiction novel The Fountains of Paradise (soon to be a Hollywood [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Here’s </font><a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast07sep_1.htm"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">an emerging sci-fi technology</font></a><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> that’s beginning to shed some of its giggle factor — enough so that a year ago last fall, Arthur C. Clarke felt comfortable saying the following in a </font><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article570053.ece"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">London Times column</font></a><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">: </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">The space elevator was the central theme in my 1978 science-fiction novel The Fountains of Paradise (soon to be a Hollywood movie). When I wrote it, I considered it little more than a fascinating thought experiment. At that time, the only material from which it could be built — diamond — was not readily available in sufficient megaton quantities. This situation has now changed, with the discovery of the third form of carbon, C60, and its relatives, the Buckminsterfullerenes.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></font><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">…As its most enthusiastic promoter, I am often asked when I think the first space elevator might be built. My answer has always been: about 50 years after everyone has stopped laughing. Maybe I should now revise it to 25 years. </font></p>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Nova aired this </font><a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sciencenow/3401/02.html"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">story</font></a><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> last month (Jan 9th) reporting some of the latest developments in the field.  IEEE Spectrum published a feature article on it </font><a href="http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/aug05/1690"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">here</font></a><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">.  Actually building a space elevator today remains a feat for the fanciful, perhaps.  But if this thing even remotely starts to materialize, watch out.  The nation that moves first on such a lifting system could accrue enormous security and economic advantages, advantages that may well be insurmountable for those that choose to stand to the side.  As such, how this story unfolds — if it does — has significant geo- and astrostrategic implications.  Is it too early to begin considering some of them?  Probably not. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></p>
<p /></font></font></font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://astropolitics.org/blog1/2007/02/12/a-panama-canal-going-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.311 seconds -->
